District Administration has allocated the entire $19.5M of Bond Closing Costs, Admin Fees and Contingency (3%), resulting in an overstatement of Prop A, and understatement of Prop B and C. Why was this done? Overconfidence that all 3 will pass? Wanting to have more to work with in Prop A if Prop A passes but others are rejected? And how was the 3% calculated – it is $12.5M but that cannot be tied back. If more information on this becomes available, this question will be updated. For now, it’s an open issue.